This site has limited support for your browser. We recommend switching to Edge, Chrome, Safari, or Firefox.

Strings Section

Chamber music can be fun, too! That, at least, is the apparent message that violinist Johnny Gandelsman is trying to spread in his two-hour program, “Johnny Loves Johann.” He’s certainly not wrong.

Performance

“Johnny Loves Johann” by Johnny Gandelsman, with John Heginbotham, Caili Quan, Jamar Roberts, and Melissa Toogood

Place

Joyce Theater, New York, NY, April 14, 2026

Words

Rebecca Deczynaski

Caili Quan and Johnny Gandelsman in “Johnny Loves Johann.” Photograph by Erin Baiano

The music of Johann Sebastian Bach hasn’t always been a natural choice for dance (though Balanchine and Robbins both found ways to work with it, most notably in “Concerto Barocco” and “Brandenburg”). In this program, a new crop of contemporary choreographers try their hand at interpreting the Baroque composer, to varying degrees of success. Melissa Toogood, Jamar Roberts, John Heginbotham, and Caili Quan take on Bach’s complete cello suites, as interpreted by Gandelsman.

The Cunningham-trained Toogood, who last year became the dean and director of Juilliard’s dance division, is up first, and she immediately establishes the lighthearted tone that will define the rest of the evening. There is an intentionally childlike tenor to her choreography. She flits across the stage with her arms like a kid playing airplane (a movement that others will repeat later). While Gandelsman’s playing is fluid—lending a folksy vibe to the cello suites—Toogood’s movement is rigid. She squeezes herself between Gandelsman’s legs. She stands with her nose inches away from his bow. The comedy here is apparent; Toogood’s pristine technique helps her to pull it off.

Roberts moves with a natural ease when he takes to the stage for the second suite. While swirling his arms in intricate formations, he maintains a sense of buoyancy—it’s almost like watching a beautiful scarf twirl around in the breeze. Where Toogood grounded her piece in static, sharp steps, Roberts is far more liquid and balletic, though he eschews self-seriousness. Consider, for instance, his lyrical take on the moonwalk. 

It’s hard not to watch Roberts, even when the rest of the cast joins him on stage for brief intervals in-between the solos that define the program and for the third and sixth pieces—the two full ensemble numbers. Sure, his 6’4-tall frame makes him easy to follow, but he also moves with such self-possession and grace that he’s a magnetic performer. For most of the evening, I kept waiting for each time he’d reappear. 

Jamar Roberts and Johnny Gandelsman in “Johnny Loves Johann.” Photograph by Erin Baiano

Jamar Roberts and Johnny Gandelsman in “Johnny Loves Johann.” Photograph by Erin Baiano

“Johnny Loves Johann,” ultimately, prioritizes character and clownery—which leads to moments of mime (Roberts drawing a portrait of Quan, which is revealed to be a portrait of Bach himself) and easy comedy (Heginbotham spinning into Roberts’ arms and drawing a leg up in a sassy parallel passé). 

The second half of the program, far more than the first, leans heavily into the goofiness. Heginbotham’s choreography is simple and repetitive, giving him the aura of a person simply improvising to an accompanying violin. He, like Toogood before, twirls with glee and runs with his arms outstretched. He also positions himself as a clown, interacting with the other performers, who playfully scoff at his attempts to connect. Here and there, he inserts a bit of a Broadway feel, throwing in a back essence. 

The weak point of “Johnny Loves Johann” is its overreliance on props and gimmicks, which, in Heginbotham’s number, take a far greater precedence than in any other piece. He dons a jacket with an affixed boa of yellow tissue paper fluffs, and, in synchronicity with the music, plucks them off one by one. A bit later, dancers from both sides—unseen—throw wadded up balls of the material onto the stage. 

Johnny Gandelsman and John Heginbotham in “Johnny Loves Johann.” Photograph by Erin Baiano

Johnny Gandelsman and John Heginbotham in “Johnny Loves Johann.” Photograph by Erin Baiano

Those props remain in place as Quan has her turn. Her style of movement is more lyrical and contemplative than that of her predecessors. She slinks in one of two chairs that stands on the stage, amid the yellow tufts. At one point, she hugs Gandelsman as he continues playing. At the start of another movement, Gandelsman stops playing live, as a recording pipes in, and he dances, awkwardly, with Quan. 

It’s not the only time that Gandelsman gets involved. At another point, he mimics Heginbotham’s poses, balancing on one leg while continuing to play. It’s a cute bit, if not profound.

The dancers eventually sweep away the yellow tissues, running long, wide brooms across the stage, and prepare for their final bit of the program: miming a sequence of fancy footwork as they sit on the floor, each holding a pair of white sneakers. It’s the kind of movement that a ballet dancer might do to mark a barre exercise before doing it full-out. Satisfying to watch, though not exactly innovative.

“Johann Loves Johnny” in its full two hours, starts to bend under the weight of its own length, and the jokes within it start to feel tired, dulling the impact of some truly luscious moments of movement. There are also plenty of simple passages—the dancers in pairs, swinging each other around with glee—that capture the unexpected levity of Bach’s cello suites. Still, the work as a whole feels a need to insist, rather than simply showing, what fun this music can be. Fit in-between jokes, the dancing often doesn’t get the space it needs to achieve its full potential.

Rebecca Deczynski


Rebecca Deczynski is a New York City-based writer and editor publishes the newsletter Mezzanine Society. Her work has appeared in publications including Inc., Domino, NYLON, and InStyle. She graduated from Barnard College cum laude with a degree in English and a minor in dance.

subscribe to the latest in dance


“Uncommonly intelligent, substantial coverage.”

Your weekly source for world-class dance reviews, interviews, articles, and more.

Already a paid subscriber? Login

comments

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

Featured

Choreographic Collage
REVIEWS | Gracia Haby

Choreographic Collage

Oliver Savariego presents a collage of parts still moving, and perhaps ever destined to always be so, in a new solo work-in-progress, “Slapdash,” at the conclusion of his Front Studio Residency at Temperance Hall.

Continue Reading
Human Touch
SCREEN DANCE | Sarah Elgart

Human Touch

I was first introduced to the work of Margot Gelber when she submitted a film she choreographed and directed to Dare to Dance in Public Film Festival (D2D), the LA based, international Dance Film Festival that I founded.

Continue Reading
Breaking the Bank
REVIEWS | Eoin Fenton

Breaking the Bank

Every year since 1881 in the forests of northern California, a secretive club of male elites in the world of politics, finance, and culture gather to burn an effigy in front of a giant statue of an owl in order to leave behind the worries of the past.

Continue Reading
Into the Spirit World
REVIEWS | Victoria Looseleaf

Into the Spirit World

Men: You can’t live with ‘em, and you can’t let ‘em die! Seriously, “Giselle,” the über-Romantic dance that premiered in Paris in 1841 and was the peak of the pre-Tchaikovsky ballets (before, for example, “Swan Lake”), was first presented by Los Angeles Ballet in its fifth season.

Continue Reading
Good Subscription Agency