Santa Barbara isn’t exactly the center of the dance world if you’re a college student with the ridiculous idea of becoming a dance critic. But just before my senior year at UC Santa Barbara, while interning at the Santa Barbara Independent, I received a packet of press releases and photos. (Back in 1997, physical photos had to be mailed in, on glossy Kodak paper). I wrote a short article on how a woman named Dianne Vapnek was starting a summer festival, and bringing out a New York choreographer named Doug Varone.
The next year, freshly returned from a senior year abroad in London, I wrote a much longer article on the second-ever Summerdance festival: a cover story. I have that cover, yellowed around the edges, dated July 9-16, 1998. Doug Varone stares out, the expression on his face both sweet and urgent, one leg flung behind him in attitude. Doug Elkins’s company came that year, too: The Doug and Doug Show, reads the story’s subhed. I have the cover, but I no longer have the actual article inside. I remember that, at 21 years old, I was fascinated by Dianne’s energetic blue eyes and by her laugh—by how genuine she seemed, considering she was a person with so much money to spend. I remember I started the newspaper story by contemplating the meaning of altruism—how Dianne seemed to be giving this festival to the artists, to the community, without desiring any personal return. Or could giving itself be the return?
That year, Dianne invited me to the festival after-party in her home across from the rose garden, riotous dancing and loud karaoke spilling into the bougainvillea-lined courtyard. When I asked Doug Elkins what dance reviews were good for, he told me a bad review was good only for wrapping fish.
But for decades, Dianne continued wanting to know what I was writing—and not just about dance. As a journalist, I’ve always been scrupulous about conflicts of interest. Dianne became the exception. She gave me a key to her magnificent home, to stay while she was traveling; I listened to Dan’s vintage Ahmad Jamal records on their turntable. After I moved to San Francisco, and then got divorced, she had me over for dinner, and the relief of feeling like part of her family made me cry. When I married again, she sent two beautiful Le Creuset pots. When I moved to North Carolina for a teaching job, she flew me to New York to be her viewing companion for all the dance shows at the APAP conference. I watched her meet up for coffee with choreographers whose work she liked—choreographers who didn’t quite make her cut for a residency. I watched them tell her about the dances they were making, how the funding was falling short, heard her say without hesitation or condition, “Of course I’ll help you.”
And yet, all through those thirty years of knowing Dianne, I kept myself slightly distant. The reason wasn’t really journalistic ethics. I grew up in a dry, ugly town with a single mother who put herself through nursing school on food stamps. Wealthy people still make me nervous, wary. Through all my years of knowing Dianne, I didn’t know Margy’s story of Dianne raising three kids in a one-bedroom apartment. I couldn’t fathom Dianne as a person who had lived month-to-month, like me, who had to navigate suddenly having money, suddenly spending money, while still keeping genuine relationships. All the same, when I met up with Dianne for lunch, when I introduced her to a man I was dating and heard her tell me, with gentle honesty, that I should keep looking—it became only natural to kiss her, to say, “I love you.” The way Dianne supported her youngest daughter’s dreams influenced how I raised my own daughter; the way she kept dancing, once throwing a Zumba class as a fundraiser, made me keep dancing, too.
A few months ago, after Margy emailed to say Dianne was declining, it so happened that I passed through Santa Barbara. I reached out to Dan; I said I didn’t want to be an imposition but I’d love to visit, and I’d leave the moment he gave me the signal that Dianne was too tired. That afternoon, Dianne sat in a beautiful mid-century chair, covered in blankets. The living room, with its floor-to-ceiling windows looking out onto the garden, was as I remembered: vast, floating, and yet comfortable. Dan was the same, too: tall but childlike, his voice shy and soft.
Dianne looked startled. She stared at me, wide-eyed; she had no language. But as I shared a few memories of dances she had helped bring into the world, dances we had watched together, she took my hand. When I said she was probably tired, I should probably be leaving, she held my hand tighter. When I told her that what she had done for art and for artists wouldn’t end, that it keeps rippling out into the world, her eyes watered, and she offered a smile that was not without pain. When I told her that, after some extreme challenges, my family life was stable, she whispered the only words I heard from her that day: “You deserve it.”
Nearly an hour had passed. Most of the time I had been talking with Dianne, I had wondered: Does she remember what I’m sharing? Is she the same Dianne? Then I thought of what I ought to share. I said, “Oh, and I’m still singing! Remember how I started doing jazz standards? At the piano bar? I’m still there singing, every week.”
All the anxiety left her face. The look in her eyes was sheer joy. And I knew then that she was unchanged inside, because that’s what she had always wanted for others: to be their wildest, most outrageous, freest selves. We held each other. I said, “I love you, Dianne.” And we said goodbye.
comments