This site has limited support for your browser. We recommend switching to Edge, Chrome, Safari, or Firefox.

In the Galleries

In Maia Chao’s “Being Moved,” the audience was ushered up to the 7th floor of the Whitney Museum of American Art in a large, crowded elevator with all sixty or so passengers carrying on conversations at maximum volume. During the slow ride, a young woman near me spent the minute dealing with her spring allergies in a most unsavory way, brandishing her tissue like a germ-filled weapon. When the doors opened, sling-style stools sat around the elevator bank facing paintings from the permanent collection as part of the “Untitled” (America) exhibition.

Performance

Maia Chao’s “Being Moved” / John Jasperse Projects's “Wandering” / Etay Axelroad's “Heron”

Place

The Whitney Museum of American Art / Marian Goodman Gallery / Carvalho, New York, May 2026

Words

Maia Chao’s “Being Moved” at the Whitney Museum of American Art. Photograph by Julieta Cervantes

We sat. I wondered why we were sitting. And why we weren’t in the Biennial galleries given that this performance was part of that group show. Also, there was the immediate question of a dirty coffee cup crushed on the floor in front of paintings by Jasper Johns and Georgia O’Keefe, pulling focus.

Soon enough there were some answers, but the nagging why of it all never went away. 

The cup was soon picked up by a performer dressed as an uptight conservator, stomping into view in clacking heels; she picked it up with gloves as if it were dreaded dog excrement. Other performers, playing the roles of museum visitors, wandered in and we watched them look at the art or rather we watched them glance at it, distracted by other things going on: random sounds like a cow mooing, relentless phone pings, sneezes, loud talking, incessant photo snaps, and a garrulous group of ladies exiting the elevator that mirrored my recent experience. 

The choreography by Lena Engelstein consisted of rounds of catching gestures as the multigenerational cast fidgeted with a vocabulary of gestures: scratches, dropping and picking up brochures, tying shoes, tilting heads, and picking wedgies. There were some bigger moves—hinges to the floor, spontaneous fainting catches, handstands, drops to the splits—by the younger dancers in the cast, the best of which was some wiggling full body articulations by James Barrett as he proceeded to over explain all the art to an unsuspecting visitor. Barrett made us laugh with his physicalized blow hard behaviors and it stood out as a highlight when most of the other bits merely garnered a half smile or an awkward hmph.

Chao also has text scores on the wall on the Biennial floor reminiscent of 1960s instruction art. In “Scores for the Museum Visitor,” a black rectangle is taped on the wall next to a series of directions, including one that encourages you to put your face inside it. Another score asks you to watch the other museum goers as they peruse the gallery. These works seem innocuous and derivative to me, but experienced in light of the staged performance, it was infinitely more fun to watch random people on a Friday morning put their nose to the wall and giggle than it was to watch some of these extraordinary movers—some of whom I have seen take dance phrases and movement scores to revelatory end (in particular I am thinking of the time Cory Seal’s draped his sweaty body across mine in the whirlwind conclusion of Faye Driscoll’s “Weathering”)—pantomime silly cliches and sing songs about being worn out from looking at art. 

In the latter half of the work an attempt was made to address the Whitney’s cancellation of a performance in 2025 by the museum’s independent study fellows about Palestinian grief. It came in the guise of a museum tour (I think mine was in German?). The performer as tour guide began explaining the scandal and ensuing protest only to be interrupted by the performers playing security. I appreciated the footnote, smartly buried in language barriers, as the Whitney’s board contains members that have ties to defense contractors embroiled in the war on Gaza. This moment, and a brief aside between Seals and Deja Rion about being “the only Black people here,” were the few nods into deeper questions than should we or shouldn’t we touch the art.

Jace Weyant, Maria Fleischman, Zo Williams, Andrea Soto, Catherine Kirk, Mak Thornquest in “Wandering” by John Jasperse with paintings by Julie Mehretu at the Marian Goodman Gallery. Photograph by Maria Baranova
 

Jace Weyant, Maria Fleischman, Zo Williams, Andrea Soto, Catherine Kirk, Mak Thornquest in “Wandering” by John Jasperse with paintings by Julie Mehretu at the Marian Goodman Gallery. Photograph by Maria Baranova

 

A week later at the Marian Goodman Gallery in lower Manhattan, the dancers in John Jasperse’s “Wandering,” did not touch the “TRANSpaintings,” of Julie Mehretu’s exhibition “Our Days, Like a Shadow (a non-abiding hauntology),” but the link between dancing bodies and the artworks was stronger. 

Conceptually aligned, Jasperse’s dance was as complex as the two-sided paintings, taking on transience, transitions, and translucence in a variety of forms. The audience was free to migrate and be caught amidst the flow of performers between the bifurcated gallery spaces spanning three floors. In this environment, partial views became most interesting, melding flesh and the unyielding materiality of the armatures of the paintings into one hybrid form. 

Shadows of dancers could be seen through the paintings, altering their composition momentarily. In one divine moment, Catherine Kirk’s lower legs appeared underneath a painting, filling in the already anthropomorphic perception of the metal armatures. Leaning off balance on one leg, Kirk’s other leg traced a pattern that evoked the confetti curves that accumulate in Mehretu’s paintings. 

Other movement motifs painted the wall with the dancers’ forms as bodies rippled into those perfect white surfaces and balanced against them as partners in squats and handstands. The use of rolled up cardboard and twin-size mattresses worked double, and sometimes triple, duty as yet another conceptual nod to transience (dancers cocooned in cardboard like unhoused neighbors), a way to create obstructed views and layers (like the paintings themselves), and also as a soft landing for daring jumps, flips, and more combative partnering.  

The effect of their juxtaposition was like a pair of scales in balance, each reinforcing the merits of the other. While I could appreciate how a solo from Zo Williams drew out pink colors I had previously not been able to see in a painting, ultimately, the paintings did not need the dance and this dance would be worth watching in an alternate setting.

Etay Axelroad in “Heron” with Guillaume Linard Osorio’s installation at Carvalho, New York. Photograph by Quinn Wharton and courtesy of Carvalho, New York

Etay Axelroad in “Heron” with Guillaume Linard Osorio’s installation at Carvalho, New York. Photograph by Quinn Wharton and courtesy of Carvalho, New York

But back in March at Carvalho, a Williamsburg gallery that is deeply attuned to collaborations between visual artists and choreographers, Etay Axelroad’s “Heron,” and Guillaume Linard Osorio’s site-responsive installation (part of his solo exhibition, Water for wild rushes) were inextricably linked.

Axelroad’s solo evoked its title, opening with the bony architecture of an awakening bird in front of a grid of Osorio’s painted polycarbonate panels, rigged to hang at an extreme rake. Contorting with finesse, Axelroad’s hips and elbows jutted out as he balanced on his head and knees without the help of his hands.  Kyle Driggs’ lighting design added layers of shadow to the painting and an air of mystery to Axelroad’s creature. A foot reaching skyward referenced dark spots floating in the landscape of the topmost panes. The lighting did a great deal to take this dance out of the realm of “activation”—where all too often movement feels like a mere accessory to the visual art—and into a moody performance where the vision was more collaborative. 

A dawning sound in Anna Lann’s original composition cued Axelroad to undulate from a crouch to a standing posture. One of his legs reached into a back attitude, using the pressure against the sculpture to allow his upper body the freedom to drift. From there, backwards walks carried Axelroad onto the structure where he jumped, slid, slunk under, and raced across it at ever more fantastic angles in a virtuosic experiment with the laws of gravity. Taboos did not seem to exist here: not only was the art touched, but it was also manipulated in service of the dance.  

Perhaps this connection, both tactile and conceptual, was so strong because the paintings in Osorio’s exhibition were inspired by a personal experience with contemporary dance. Osorio even uses paint inside the cells of his polycarbonate canvases in a way that calls to mind the chance operations of John Cage and Merce Cunningham.  

The rough play left the sculpture reverberating with quakes but also seemed to shake up the atmosphere of the room and place the audience in a more active relationship to what we were watching. Though Axelroad eventually made his way back to stillness, hovering in a balance on his head again, we were left with the somatic ripples of those risky bursts of energy. In the galleries after the performance, the kinetic force of the paintings came into focus for me. Feeling inspired, and perhaps reckless (or foolish?), I asked for a price list for the works on my way out. 

Candice Thompson


Candice Thompson has been working in and around live art for over two decades. She was a dancer with Milwaukee Ballet before moving into costume design, movement education and direction, editing and arts writing. She attended New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts, graduated from St. Mary’s College LEAP Program, and later received an MFA in literary nonfiction from Columbia University. From 2010-2021 she was editorial director of DIYdancer, a project-based media company she co-founded. Her writing on dance can be found in publications like AndscapeALL ARTS, ArtsATL, The Brooklyn Rail, Dance Magazine, and the New York Times.  

subscribe to the latest in dance


“Uncommonly intelligent, substantial coverage.”

Your weekly source for world-class dance reviews, interviews, articles, and more.

Already a paid subscriber? Login

comments

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

Featured

In the Galleries
FIELD NOTES | Candice Thompson

In the Galleries

In Maia Chao’s “Being Moved,” the audience was ushered up to the 7th floor of the Whitney Museum of American Art in a large, crowded elevator with all sixty or so passengers carrying on conversations at maximum volume.

Continue Reading
Stars and Stripes
REVIEWS | Victoria Looseleaf

Stars and Stripes

They’re saucy, sweet and stunning! They’re the ballerinas of American Contemporary Ballet and they’re helping close the company’s 2025-26 season with performances of “Spectacular Balanchine,” a program devoted to the choreography of George Balanchine. 

Continue Reading
Testing Assumptions
REVIEWS | Steve Sucato

Testing Assumptions

The current global zeitgeist of uncertainty and the tendency to jump to judgment inspired veteran dancer-choreographer Beth Corning's latest dance-theater work, “Foolish Assumptions.” 

Continue Reading
Good Subscription Agency