This site has limited support for your browser. We recommend switching to Edge, Chrome, Safari, or Firefox.

A Tale of Woe

There is probably no more beloved ballet, by audiences and dancers alike, than “Romeo and Juliet.” The tale, which Shakespeare borrowed from a sixteenth-century novella by the prolific storyteller Matteo Bandello, contains so many of the elements people love in ballet: a desperate love story, several gushing pas de deux for the young protagonists, a headstrong heroine, a colorful setting (Renaissance Verona). And, in Prokofiev’s 1935 score, a musical backdrop of cinematic sweep, with swelling melodies that beg for voluptuous, windswept dancing.

Performance

Sarasota Ballet: “Romeo and Juliet” by Frederick Ashton

Place

Performing Arts Hall, Sarasota, FL, March 28, 2025

Words

Marina Harss

Macarena Gimenez and Luke Schaufuss in Ashton's “Romeo and Juliet.” Photograph by Frank Atura

subscribe to the latest in dance


“Uncommonly intelligent, substantial coverage.”

Your weekly source for world-class dance reviews, interviews, articles, and more.

Already a paid subscriber? Login

No surprise, then, that there has been an endless number of versions of the ballet since the premiere of the first production to employ Prokofiev’s music, choreographed by Leonid Lavrovsky for the Kirov Ballet, starring Galina Ulanova, in 1940. The Lavrovsky was later transferred to Moscow’s Bolshoi, which brought it to London, along with Ulanova, in 1956. That London premiere had a profound effect on ballet outside of Russia, as it did on the many versions of “Romeo and Juliet” that would eventually follow. Time after time, one sees heart-in-the-throat partnering, an equal amount of running, big lifts, dramatic acting, the fluttering of capes, sword fights, silent screams.

Frederick Ashton’s version, which the Sarasota Ballet has brought back to the stage this week, is a predecessor to all that. Made in 1955 for the Royal Danish Ballet, it was the first to use Prokofiev’s score outside of Russia but had its premiere before anyone had seen Ulanova’s Juliet or Lavrovsky’s choreography. Ashton had a clean slate to work with, to the extent that that is possible when talking about this Prokofiev score. (It practically tells the choreographer what to do.) And perhaps for that reason, the Ashton is far less rapturous or heavy-handed than later versions by John Cranko, Kenneth MacMillan, and others. Unlike those, its focus is on dancing rather than dance-acting. It has the feel of a ballet, with set pieces to illustrate each scene, rather than a through-written dance play.

In part because of this, it has a sketchiness, a thinness of material that makes it feel not quite finished. At certain moments, one can see elements of Ashton’s greatness in it, but that impression is not sustained. The characters are thinly portrayed, and there is much repetition. In the opening, Romeo performs one arabesque while flourishing his cloak, and then another, and then yet another. Tybalt (the fabulously nasty Ricki Bertoni) scratches at his arm with his fingernails again and again to tell us how genuinely nasty he is. The lovers bend their backs deeply to indicate the voluptuousness of their attraction to each other, with an insistence that eventually lessens the movement’s effect. And in her opening scene, Juliet bourrées forward, her feet in front of her as if to indicate her eagerness, a few times too many.

The repetition and lack of sustained choreographic inspiration is magnified, I suspect, by Sarasota Ballet’s staging. The performance I saw, on March 28, looked not fully realized, as if the dancers were still finding themselves in the roles. The ballet’s route to Sarasota is circuitous. The original was performed in Copenhagen in 1955, in a cast led by the great Danish dancers Mona Vangsaae, Henning Kronstam (Romeo), and Frank Schaufuss (Mercutio). It toured to the U.S. in ’56, ’60, and ’65 (thank you to the Sarasota Herald-Tribune’s Carrie Seidman for this chronology).

Maximiliano Iglesias and Sierra Abelardo in Ashton's “Romeo and Juliet.” Photograph by Frank Atura

Thereafter it was dropped from the Royal Danish Ballet’s repertory. In 1984, Frank Schaufuss’s son, Peter Schaufuss, who had performed the role of the page in the original, became the director of London Festival Ballet, the precursor of English National Ballet. Schaufuss invited Ashton to re-stage his “Romeo” there, which he did, even creating a new pas de trois for Romeo, Mercutio, and Benvolio.

Schaufuss has also staged the ballet, including for Natalia Osipova and Ivan Vasiliev in 2011, and most recently in 2016, for Los Angeles Ballet. In that production, his own son, Luke Schaufuss, danced the role of Mercutio, first taken by his father (Frank Schaufuss). And now it comes to Sarasota, where Luke Schaufuss is a principal. Three generations, all connected to the same ballet! On opening night, Luke Schaufuss performed Romeo alongside the Argentine ballerina Macarena Giménez.

The ballet was staged in Sarasota by Marilyn Vella-Gatt, a notation specialist, using a Benesh notation (a form of dance notation) score created in 1985 at the English National Ballet. Additional coaching was done by Patrick Armand, who danced the role of Paris in that 1985 production. Peter Schaufuss led some rehearsals via Zoom. This is all interesting backstory, but the circuitousness of the trajectory may in fact have something to do with the overall effect of the ballet in Sarasota. The dancing here lacked the vividness that a long and detailed period of gestation and careful coaching with a choreographer or a choreographic associate would give it. The characterizations, for the most part, were generic. The musicality was flat, correct, without highs or lows, despite a propulsive performance of the music by the Sarasota Orchestra, under the baton of Jonathan McPhee. The dancers looked as if they were still digesting the steps. There was no extra space in the brain, or élan in the body, to allow for spontaneity, interpretation, imagination.

This was especially true of Luke Schaufuss, whose dancing was unimpeachable (if not terribly exciting) but who seemed unable to muster more than an amiable boyishness in the role of Romeo. In an apparent lack of specific direction, Giménez reverted to a bright smile in the early sections of the ballet but found her emotional center halfway through, in the bedroom scene. From that point on, the hopelessness of Juliet’s situation suffused Giménez’s movements, and her face, with a touching desperation, combined with a sudden maturity and gravity. She performed the role’s many hops on pointe impeccably. Even so, there was little chemistry between the lovers.

Macarena Gimenez & Luke Schaufuss in Ashton's “Romeo and Juliet.” Photograph by Frank Atura

The three young men—Schaufuss, Maximiliano Iglesias’s Mercutio, and Samuel Gest’s Benvolio—got through the tricky male choreography, filled with beats in the Danish style, without much joy or freedom to spare. In this version, Mercutio has a girlfriend, Livia, who dances some of the trickiest choreography. Here the role danced with energy and precision by Sierra Abelardo. The ensembles were cleanly danced, especially the second, in Act III, which includes a wonderful flag dance, full of fluttering ribbons, reminiscent of the Maypole in Ashton’s “La Fille mal gardée.” But I couldn’t help feeling that even this scene could be danced with greater amplitude and freedom. Daniel Pratt was an elegant and touching Paris; it is in his duet with Juliet at the ball that we first see the famous “Fred Step,” a charming combination of small steps that Ashton loved to insert into his ballets. I always become aware of it because of a kind of rocking motion in the steps—first this way, and then that way, then a little pas de chat jump, and then a low arabesque. There are at least two more of these Fred Steps in the ballet, one performed by the corps at the end of the ballet, and another by the Nurse’s page on her way to the piazza to find Romeo. I’m always happy to see them.

The ballet does, of course, include moments of inspiration. It is by Ashton, after all. The trembling in Romeo and Juliet’s hands when they first meet at the ball. Juliet’s moment alone in the Capulet garden, where she becomes one with nature, a sylph in the moonlight. The way Romeo loops Juliet’s arms around her shoulders and neck in their pas de deux, as if creating a web of love around her. The way she dives forward in his arms in the bedroom scene, and he gingerly turns her upright, as Oberon does with Titania in Ashton’s “The Dream.”

These are the kinds of details that suffuse Ashton’s ballets, making them so poignant, so alive. Here, they stand out, not as a unifying stream of ideas but as small revelations, bursts of emotion that appear and then fade away again. They leave you wanting more.

Marina Harss


Marina Harss is a dance writer in New York, a frequent contributor to the New York Times and the New Yorker Magazine, as well as to Dance Magazine and Fjord Review. She is the author of a book about the choreographer Alexei Ratmansky, The Boy from Kyiv, published by Farrar Straus and Giroux in 2023.

comments

Featured

Beauty Reawakens
REVIEWS | Elsa Simonetti

Beauty Reawakens

Vous les voyez, les étoiles dans la salle?” the woman next to me whispered as the lights dimmed. And indeed, the stalls glittered with former stars of the Paris Opéra Ballet— dancers I recognised, visibly moved and deep in conversation during the interval.

Continue Reading
A New Memory
INTERVIEWS | Candice Thompson

A New Memory

In 2017 Virginie Mécène reimagined the lost Martha Graham solo “Ekstatis.” A review from that Martha Graham Dance Company premiere ended with a strong vote of confidence from critic Gia Kourlas: “Ms. Mécène should keep going.”

Continue Reading
Arc of Life
INTERVIEWS | Karen Hildebrand

Arc of Life

On one of the first spring-like days this year in NYC, I arrive at Barnard College to observe rehearsal for John Jasperse’s new piece, “Tides,” which will open the LaMama Moves! Dance Festival on April 10.

Continue Reading
Good Subscription Agency