In costumes of perfect fit, re-created by the Australian Ballet wardrobe department, and with volunteers from the Country Women’s Association and Embroidery Guild, 18,000 jewels have been hand-sewn in place so as to twinkle as brightly as if it were 1967, or the perfumed cloud of the nineteenth century, or wherever it is that the triptych of “Emeralds,” “Rubies”, and “Diamonds” transports you. Balanchine calls for precision, both on stage and off, with each flower within “Emeralds” consisting of 52 beads. With two flowers per costume, comprised of 104 beads, which take around two hours to sew, the click-clack lustre of jewels is quite the mathematical sum. “The ‘Emeralds’ corps has 36 dancers and The Australian Ballet makes two sets of these costumes for understudies and alternates. 72 costumes x 104 beads = 7,488 beads just on the shoulders for ‘Emeralds!’”[3]
“Jewels,” a ballet in three parts, though you’ll also find “Rubies” and “Diamonds”, and “Emeralds” less so, presented in their own right, must be performed as was, as is. It is nothing if not specific adherence. And yet it is also free in the flickering flow of images it presents and thoughts it encourages to the surface. There is the emphasis upon technical brilliance but suffused with emotion, and, in the case of “Emeralds,” green-leaf tendrilled mystery.
comments