Maybe “Myokine Deficiency” (a condition linked to frailty and sarcopenia) would have been a better title. However, there were two motifs that could possibly be linked to the purposeful firing of muscles: the pulling back of an arrow and hammering at the ground. But much of the dancers’ invisible archery was impotent, with the dancers tipping over before unleashing their shots. And the kneeling strikers evoked railroad slaves or coal miners, reading as more futile than productive—Sisyphean over industrious. Both theme steps appeared to be more of the empty gesticulations that are so common in contemporary dance right now—a trend I’d call pantomime Tourette’s.
Did I like anything? Yes. I thought it was cool when one dancer was soloing slowly in a front corner spotlight while another was moving superfast in the dark upstage, barely discernible. It made for a creepy haunted-house effect. I also liked the winey palette of the dancers’ casual separates, by Marie-Audrey Jacques, though I have no idea why they changed into black biketards and camisoles as the piece progressed. Nor do I know why the dim lighting, by Eric Chad, turn slightly amber by the end. I did not feel as if I’d been taken on any sort of journey to necessitate these shifts. It all felt like more of the self-serious same, for an excessive amount of time.
As I watched “Myokine,” it occurred to me that this whole bleak genre could be the choreographic fallout of Covid-19. The spasmic paranoia, the way the dancers seem disconnected even in unison clumps, the minimal partnering, the dejected slumping (no one seems to want to stand upright), and the clipped-wing aspect of the movements might all be part of a pandemic hangover. (Though many of these trends preceded the coronavirus—maybe these fads are partly a reaction to smart phone dissociation?) Whatever the case, I hope choreographers get it out of their systems soon, because this piece, like so many others of its ilk, did not seem to be working through or examining troubling issues so much as wallowing in them.
comments