Questo sito non supporta completamente il tuo browser. Ti consigliamo di utilizzare Edge, Chrome, Safari o Firefox.

Give and Take

There are few dancers who can reconcile vigour and grace as seamlessly as Sylvie Guillem, she of Paris Opera and Royal Ballet fame. The French superstar teamed up with the acclaimed Russell Maliphant to create “Push” back in 2005, and nine years, dozens of performances and a handful of awards later, the programme feels fresh as ever as it returns to London for its final run.

Performance

Sylvie Guillem and Russell Maliphant: “Push”

Place

London Coliseum, London, UK, July 29-August 3, 2014

Words

Sara Veale

Russell Maliphant and Sylvie Guillem in “Push” choreography by Russell Maliphant. Photograph by Johan Persson

subscribe to the latest in dance


“Uncommonly intelligent, substantial coverage.”

Your weekly source for world-class dance reviews, interviews, articles, and more.

Already a paid subscriber? Login

Guillem and Maliphant’s alliance initially raised a few eyebrows, and understandably so: the former’s sky-high leaps and classical lines are legendary, whereas the latter has long favoured a grounded style marked with yogic shapes and calm comportment. “Push” quashes any scepticism as to their artistic compatibility early on, however, imparting a clear-cut reciprocity in which Guillem and Maliphant not only tender their own strengths but mine each other’s. The give and take is adroit and organic, and aligns their respective aesthetics beautifully.

“Solo” is the first of the bill's four pieces and celebrates, among other things, Guillem's marvellous flexibility and speed. These feats play out against a backdrop of peach hues and slinky Spanish guitar strings, Guillem's tiny frame silhouetted in the warm glow of Michael Hulls’ lighting design. The choreography is fluid and the pace mellow—even at its apex, when a flush of azure hues ushers in a regal tone, it never feels frantic, despite the uncanny swiftness with which Guillem approaches her tilts and whirls. The flamenco-accented choreography is a real treat, juxtaposing cocky flicks of the foot against the lithe linearity of classical attitudes and arabesques.

Sylvie Guillem and Russell Maliphant
Sylvie Guillem and Russell Maliphant in “Push.” Photograph by Johan Persson

“Shift” sees Maliphant reprise a performance from 1996 that's only technically a solo: three shadows of his person are projected on the back screen, stretching and twisting alongside him as he cuts a series of bowed shapes across the stage. These avatars shrink and magnify accordingly as Maliphant moves up and downstage, and at times meld into one, a lone partner to echo the serene pliancy of the flexing and turning at hand. The perfect sync between Maliphant and his shadows is wholly gratifying, as is the organic progression of his choreography, which almost feels improvised in its instinctive shift from one shape to another.

Guillem returns for “Two,” an electric solo performed entirely within a small square of light pooled in the middle of the stage. Carys Staton recently performed this role in Maliphant's “Still Current,” delivering a brisk buoyancy teeming with heart. By contrast, Guillem brings a weightier, more vigorous dynamic to “Two,” thrusting rather than swimming, slicing instead of sweeping. The piece is wildly different in tone from the “Shift”—frenetic, edgy, pulsing—and proves the perfect showcase for Guillem's control and fierce mien, what with its speed and precarious balances. The lighting design fuels this sense of fervour, leaving flickering beams blazing in the wake of Guillem's windmill arms.

Sylvie Guillem
Sylvie Guillem dancing “Solo.” Image courtesy of Sadler's Wells

Finally the two dancers converge for “Push,” an intimate, hypnotic duet brimming with lyricism. From the offset Guillem and Maliphant establish a physical dialogue and proceed to craft it into a rich conversation, one that swirls through a bevy of emotions—bliss, melancholy, content. The programme's first three pieces leave no question as to the dancers' individual capabilities, but together their strengths appear insuperable: he breathes life into her, and she in turn projects this vitality outward, pitching forth a galvanising verve through the tips of her outstretched fingers and toes. The choreography—which marries ballet, modern and a dash of acrobatics—is substantial and symbiotic; rare is the moment when Guillem and Maliphant aren't touching or sharing weight. The lighting and music are likewise robust, rounding out the holy trinity Maliphant does so well. Andy Cowton’s score swerves from wailing vocals to warbling piano keys and haunting violin strings, and Hull's lighting design follows suit, radiating mellow shades of blue that later bleed into a tense crimson haze. It's drama without the theatrics, and it's done very, very well.

Sara Veale


Sara Veale is a London-based writer and editor. She's written about dance for the Observer, the Spectator, DanceTabs, Auditorium Magazine, Exeunt and more. Her first book, Untamed: The Radical Women of Modern Dance, will be published in 2024.

comments

Featured

A Bug Menagerie
REVIEWS | Marina Harss

A Bug Menagerie

The Sarasota Ballet does not do a “Nutcracker”—they leave that to their associate school. Instead, over the weekend, the company offered a triple bill of which just one ballet, Frederick Ashton’s winter-themed “Les Patineurs,” nodded at the season. 

Continua a leggere
Hard (Nut) Facts
REVIEWS | Faye Arthurs

Hard (Nut) Facts

I couldn’t stop thinking about hockey at the New York City Ballet’s “Nutcracker” this year, and not only because the stage appeared to be made of ice: there were a slew of spectacular falls one night I attended.

Continua a leggere
Other Delights
REVIEWS | Candice Thompson

Other Delights

Last week, during the first Fjord Review Dance Critics’ Festival, Mindy Aloff discussed and read from an Edwin Denby essay during “The Critic’s Process” panel.

Continua a leggere
Good Subscription Agency