Questo sito non supporta completamente il tuo browser. Ti consigliamo di utilizzare Edge, Chrome, Safari o Firefox.

Fated Love

San Francisco Ballet artistic director Tamara Rojo has often said she believes ballet should operate more like Broadway, where shows have previews and work through revisions before the real premiere. Watching opening night and a Saturday matinee of Yuri Possokhov’s ambitious new “Eugene Onegin,” I was swayed by her point. True to Possokhov’s style, this “Onegin” is bold and occasionally bombastic. It is also deeply committed to the layers and nuances of Pushkin’s novel. Because it is a sincere work of art and not a slick package pandering for box office sales I admired it, and I felt the potential to be moved by it. And yet I couldn’t help noticing throughout where it might be trimmed, where the arc of a scene could be refocused.

Performance

San Francisco Ballet: Yuri Possokhov’s “Eugene Onegin”

Place

War Memorial Opera House, San Francisco, CA, January 23 and 24, 2026

Words

Rachel Howard

Joseph Walsh in Yuri Possokhov's “Eugene Onegin.” Photograph by Lindsey Rallo

“Onegin” marks a homecoming. Possokhov made his first-ever choreographic foray, the surrealist “Magrittomania,” in 2000, while still a muscled, square-jawed principal dancer at San Francisco Ballet. Two years later his take on “Medea” was equally beloved locally, though poo-pooed on tour to New York. Oh, the places Possokhov’s career has taken him since! The Royal Danish, the Bolshoi, the Joffrey (which co-commissioned this “Onegin”)—all have tapped Possokhov to make original full-lengths, with his “Nureyev” for the Bolshoi garnering international headlines after the Russian government imprisoned a member of the artistic team. In the meantime, although Possokhov was named choreographer in residence in San Francisco immediately after his retirement from the stage in 2006, his commissions here have been short. So it felt right, a way of building on the company’s history, to have Possokhov’s “Onegin” open San Francisco Ballet’s 93rd season.

Why another “Onegin”? The short answer from Rojo last year was “Because Yuri is passionate about it.” After opening night, despite feeling it needs tweaks, I could get behind that. From the first scene, in which Onegin stands before his uncle’s coffin, giving a restrained tendu to show us his stiff despair, this is nothing like John Cranko’s popular “Onegin” from 1965, and not just because of Ilya Demutsky’s commissioned score. (More on that soon.) Possokhov’s fidelity to the novel’s poetry and not just its plot is literally written on the stage scrim, as lines from Pushkin’s cantos periodically appear, intoned by a posh-voiced British narrator. As in the novel, this narrator and the main character are echoes of each other, both horrified by the inevitability of death. This proto-existentialist horror is the cause of Eugene’s indifferent, amoral stance towards life.

If you’re a ballet fan, you probably know Pushkin’s plot. The Larina sisters live in the Russian countryside. Olga, the extroverted younger sister, is engaged to the adoring, naïve Lensky; Tatiana, the elder sister, is introverted, infatuated with romance novels, and fated to fall hard for Eugene. She writes a declaration of love (Possokhov’s ballet treats this with a split-screen set up contrasting Tatiana’s excitement and Eugene’s dread), which he coldly rebuffs, setting the stage, unwittingly, for a deadly duel. In the ballet as in the novel, the jump to “years later” is sudden and awkward, but the reversal is delicious: Tatiana, sophisticated and married, tells a despondent Onegin that he missed his chance.

Sasha De Sola and Francesco Gabriele Frola in Yuri Possokhov's “Eugene Onegin.” Photograph by Lindsey Rallo

Sasha De Sola and Francesco Gabriele Frola in Yuri Possokhov's “Eugene Onegin.” Photograph by Lindsey Rallo

As in Cranko’s rendition, the choreographic meat of Possokhov’s ballet is in the first and final pas de deuxs for Tatiana and Onegin. That last pas de deux is the best five minutes of the ballet, as Tatiana’s lingering yearning for what could have been transforms into fierce jumps and moral resolve. In between, though, come the really interesting original touches. Possokhov builds his ballet upon the seasons, embodied by ensembles: flitting female sprites in pink and green tunics for spring (these whisper-thin costumes by Tim Yip were my favorite), fiery male summer spirits in red, three autumn couples in brown, and a final winter ensemble that links arms with Eugene, carrying him into the storm.    

Unlike Cranko, Possokhov also includes Tatiana’s dream from the novel—Onegin invades her bed as a bear, flanked by masked rabbits and other creatures. I loved this inclusion for the way it brings in psychologically rich layers of sexual repression. And yet, like the flighty interludes for spring, Tatiana’s dream is too long. As in: stretching-the-first-act-to-way-over-an-hour-so-that-you-need-a-drink long. And there are deeper problems with the emotional pacing of the ballet, and a few places that will leave even the most devoted reader of program notes scratching her noggin. 

After that long section for spring (made considerably more tolerable by Nikisha Fogo’s fearlessly flirty dancing as the lead sprite on opening night), the first pas de deux for Olga and Lensky beats us over the head with too much feeling, too fast. (Damn if those aren’t some inventive lifts, though.) When Lensky and Eugene meet up for their duel, they smack their fists to their chests and fling themselves into double grande assembles en tournant for what feels like an eternity. Conversely, Eugene’s flirtation with Olga—the catalyst for the duel—happens far too suddenly. The storytelling then becomes especially turgid after Lensky’s death, when Tatiana and Olga’s emotions turn mysterious. Cranko’s version smartly lets us see the sister’s sadness and shock right as the duel is happening, but Possokhov requires a scene change, and then Tatiana leaves her despondent sister on the floor and simply walks out without a glance back—why? This is followed by a whole extra scene with Olga and three officers that isn’t even explained in the libretto, a very easy cut. 

Katherine Barkman and Joseph Walsh in Yuri Possokhov's “Eugene Onegin.” Photograph by Lindsey Rallo

Katherine Barkman and Joseph Walsh in Yuri Possokhov's “Eugene Onegin.” Photograph by Lindsey Rallo

Do these faults lie at the feet of Possokhov, librettist Valeriy Pecheykin, or composer Ilya Demutsky? It is impossible to say, but it is clear that the team, collectively, should sit down with an editor. Personally, I wouldn’t mind seeing some of Demutsky’s music shorn. In a “Works and Process” interview at the Guggenheim last fall, SF Ballet’s music director Martin West was practically worshipful about Demutsky’s score, comparing it to Prokofiev. I heard a similarity in certain scenes—the horn-heavy pounding of oppression isn’t subtle, and the creepy waltzes remind me of “Cinderella”—but I can’t say that any of the swelling love melodies stayed in mind, even after a second listen. Then there are the razz-ma-tazz passages where the spring sprites hoof it up, almost Charleston-style. I felt I had suddenly jumped into a Gene Kelly musical.

All this said, the cathartic final scene, when Tom Pye’s serviceable scenery falls away, leaving Eugene alone in the snow, is a wonder. That’s why I’d be eager to see refinements, and to see this “Eugene Onegin” come back. No doubt it will, and when it does, which cast you see will still matter hugely. Floppy-haired, with a mischievous face you can read three miles away, Joseph Walsh was made to be Eugene, and along with flawlessly controlled dancing, he imbued the role with charm and charisma—an essential likeability lurking beneath his contempt and self-regard. Opening night’s Tatiana, soloist Katherine Barkman, came off as thoughtful and inherently dignified, and her commanding performance proved for the umpteenth time that she deserves promotion to principal. As Lensky, Wei Wang seamlessly melded his classical technique to Possokhov’s floorwork and his naturalistic style. Wona Park was a perfect match, the sweetness of her character embodied in her lightness, not telegraphed through facial expressions.

At Saturday’s matinee, our Eugene was Francesco Gabriele Frola, and although his dancing was powerful, the glimpses of charm that draw us towards Eugene were nowhere to be seen. Sasha De Sola could not compensate for this as Tatiana, more coy than Barkman’s interpretation. Among this second cast it was Esteban Hernandez who most distinguished himself as Lensky, seemingly on the verge of tears in the duel scene, so convincing I nearly cried for him. But it is the title character we must cry for in this “Eugene Onegin”—the title character who represents our own existential peril. Great novels are not written in one draft, and few ballets are instant masterpieces. Revision requires both time and fortitude. Possokhov and Demutsky have embraced a high literary challenge. May they rise to it. 

Rachel Howard


Rachel Howard is the former lead dance critic of the San Francisco Chronicle. Her dance writing has also appeared in the New York Times, the Hudson Review, Ballet Review, San Francisco Magazine and Dance Magazine.

subscribe to the latest in dance


“Uncommonly intelligent, substantial coverage.”

Your weekly source for world-class dance reviews, interviews, articles, and more.

Already a paid subscriber? Login

comments

Ricorda che i commenti devono essere approvati prima di essere pubblicati

Featured

Tempests of Love
REVIEWS | Sara Veale

Tempests of Love

Oh to love and be loved, what a beautiful mess it is. Nobody captures the contradictions of passion quite like Pina Bausch, whose “Sweet Mambo” is cast in her signature silly-meets-sincere mould—another treat for us Bausch bods out here, less fetching perhaps if you’re not a fan of her highly mannered house style.

Continua a leggere
The Beauty of Ballet
REVIEWS | Elsa Giovanna Simonetti

The Beauty of Ballet

Continuing a project launched in 2019, lyrical singer Ekaterina Anapolskaya and former Opéra de Paris sujet, now professor at the ballet school, Gilles Isoart curated an evening of international guests conceived as a celebration of the nineteenth-century heritage.

Continua a leggere
Good Subscription Agency