Questo sito non supporta completamente il tuo browser. Ti consigliamo di utilizzare Edge, Chrome, Safari o Firefox.

Beauty, Streamlined

George Balanchine had a special place in his heart for “The Sleeping Beauty.” It was a ballet that he always wanted to stage but never had the means—and the space—to do it properly; and he refused to do it on the budget. “He would put it on only if he could produce it on a scale comparable to “The Sleeping Beauty” whose enchantment he would never forget, the one he had appeared in as a boy in St. Petersburg, where the company had numbered some two hundred dancers and the stage had been grand enough for the most spectacular effects,” Bernard Taper described Balanchine’s sentiment towards this production in his excellent biography of the great choreographer.

Performance

New York City Ballet: “The Sleeping Beauty”

Place

David H. Koch Theater, New York, New York, February 10, 2017

Words

Oksana Khadarina

Tiler Peck and Tyler Angle in “The Sleeping Beauty.” Photograph by Paul Kolnik

subscribe to the latest in dance


“Uncommonly intelligent, substantial coverage.”

Your weekly source for world-class dance reviews, interviews, articles, and more.

Already a paid subscriber? Login

Eventually New York City Ballet got its own “Beauty.” The ballet, which is rightly regarded as the touchstone of the 19th-century classicism and Tchaikovsky’s crown achievement, was premiered by the company in 1991, nearly 8 years after Balanchine’s death. This production was staged by NYCB’s ballet master in chief, Peter Martins and included Balanchine’s exquisitely ornate “Garland Dance,” which he created for the 1981 Tchaikovsky’s Festival.

There is much to admire about Martins’s thoroughly modern staging of “The Sleeping Beauty.” For one thing, this production is never dull and lethargic. There is nothing sleepy about this “Beauty.” It’s full of life, excitement, and vigor; and it tells the ballet’s story about a cursed Princess Aurora who falls into a century-long slumber with engaging flair and welcome efficiency; and the lavish costumes by Patricia Zipprodt and elaborate scenery by David Mitchell alone are worth the trip to the theater. Yet the greatest gift of this staging is its appreciation that “Beauty” is above all a ballet about classical dancing and here Petitpa’s ravishing choreography shines and sparkles in all its glory, mostly undiluted and unadorned.

However, there are certain drawbacks. If you want to soak up the magic of this fairytale; to fully experience the strong emotional currents of a struggle between light and darkness, good and evil, life and death (and it’s this struggle that ultimately forms the dramatic core of the entire ballet); to luxuriate in the perfume of the imperial era; and to indulge in the infinite pleasures of Tchaikovsky’s score – you might be bitterly disappointed. This “Beauty” is akin to a typical New Yorker navigating the morning rush-hour: cool, determined, and fast. Martins compressed the original material (nearly a four-hour show) into two acts, each lasting a little more than an hour. Forget the eloquent pantomime and delicate, aristocratic manners. The speed is the key to this no-nonsense “Beauty.”

Would Balanchine approve such a straightforward, modern approach to this beloved classic? It’s hard to tell. The choreographer took two very dissimilar approaches when it came to staging two other Tchaikovsky’s ballets. His sumptuous production of “The Nutcracker” was a spectacle on a grand scale, with all the pageantry and pantomime left intact. His version of “Swan Lake,” however, was a one-act distillation of the original production, where only dancing carried the highly abbreviated story line.

But watching the performance on Friday night, one thing I was certain of—Balanchine would be infinitely delighted to see these dancers in action. It seemed as if there was nothing that they couldn’t do—the sheer ease with which they sailed through some of the most physically and stylistically taxing choreography in the classical ballet canon was remarkable to witness; and their dedication and assuredness rendered this production with a totally different sense of grandeur. They kept the spirit of classicism alive, infusing it with unbound energy of our time.

The effervescent and radiant Tiler Peck danced the title role with a palpable sense of excitement and irresistible joy. She is a ballerina of an extraordinary musicality and it’s her immediate and intelligent responsiveness to the music that makes her dancing a rare art. From the first entrance of Aurora at her birthday celebration party, Peck inhabited her role completely. Her young heroine was everything that a coming-of-age princess should be: blissfully carefree and happy, and delightfully charming; and this sense of utter cheerfulness and youthful elation brightly reverberated in Peck’s dazzling footwork. Yet the ballerina also demonstrated her dramatic side. She was emotionally transformed in the famous Rose adagio, gliding from one arabesque to another with a wonderful legato phrasing and revealing the numerous intricacies of the choreography with serene lucidity and regal composure, her every step colored with lovely nuance and texture. In the Vision Scene, as her Aurora beckoned Prince Désiré to come to her rescue, Peck looked mysterious and phantom-like, with her dancing acquiring a feel of warmth and enigma.

In Martins’s staging, unfortunately, the Vision Scene is a very brief episode, almost entirely devoid of pantomime and of its original connotation of romantic yearning for ideal love; yet Peck, together with the ever-gracious Tyler Angle in the role of the Prince, made the most of it. A dancer of strong technique and impeccable manners, Angle proved a perfect cavalier. With a heavily truncated hunting party and the rushed and unremarkable scene of awakening, the Prince has little prominence in this production. The only real moment for him to shine is the wedding pas de deux in the final act and in it Angle was every inch of a Prince Charming, partnering Peck with confidence, stately poise, and alluring grace.

Perfectly capturing the essence of her character, Ashley Laracey imbued the role of the benevolent Lilac Fairy, who is a dazzling leader of the fairies and Aurora’s protector and savior, with dignified glamour and sumptuousness. From her entourage, Claire Kretzschmar as the Fairy of Generosity, Indiana Woodward as the Fairy of Eloquence and Unity Phelan as the Fairy of Courage made a particular impression. Rebecca Krohn had a marvelous turn as a pompous and harsh Carabosse, the evil fairy and a symbol of the dark forces, who puts a fateful curse on the baby Aurora and sends the royal household into disarray.

The wedding celebrations of Aurora and her Prince looked as if only half of the guests had shown up—a far cry from the enormous glittering crowd of courtiers and a long cavalcade of the fairytale characters that Balanchine so vividly remembered from his childhood in St. Petersburg. From those who did show up, Lauren King stood out as an impetuous Princess Florine; Ashley Isaacs and Brittany Pollack shone in the roles of Ruby and Emerald, respectively; and an adorable tiny dancer, Alessia Riera, ultimately stole the audience’s hears as a very brave and resourceful Little Red Riding Hood.

Oksana Khadarina


Oksana Khadarina is a Washington, DC–based dance writer. She has been covering dance at The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, as well as in New York City and internationally, since 2006. She has written for Dance Magazine, Pointe and DanceTabs, among other publications.

comments

Featured

Moving Portraits
REVIEWS | Gracia Haby

Moving Portraits

Beneath a tree also over a century old is where I meet dancer and artist Eileen Kramer, and where the 60-minute loop will end. And it feels fitting, on the heels of her recent death on November 15, 2024, at 110-years-of-age, to start here, at effectively the end of Sue Healey’s screening of On View: Icons.

FREE ARTICLE
Falling for Hubbard
REVIEWS | Roísín O'Brien

Falling for Hubbard

Hubbard Street Dance Chicago’s Fall Series will entertain you. Deftly curated, with choreographers ranging from Aszure Barton to Bob Fosse, Hubbard’s dancers ably morph through this riveting programme of showmanship.

FREE ARTICLE
Good Subscription Agency