This site has limited support for your browser. We recommend switching to Edge, Chrome, Safari, or Firefox.

Rare Pearls

George Balanchine’s “Ballo della Regina” and “Kammermusik No. 2” were created approximately at the same time and premiered by New York City Ballet in January 1978. Both pieces are concise and small in scale; both are fascinating and unique; yet neither belongs to the pantheon of Balanchine’s greatest creations. Nevertheless, each ballet, precious in its own way, adds to our understanding and appreciation of the craft of the great ballet master. Dance critic Arlene Croce aptly summed up her attraction to “Ballo della Regina” in particular—and to a Balanchine ballet in general—simply and clearly: “Who cares if it isn’t great? The greatest Balanchine ballet is the one you happen to be watching.”

Performance

New York City Ballet: All Balanchine I

Place

David H. Koch Theater, Lincoln Center, New York, NY, February 6 (matinee), 2016

Words

Oksana Khadarina

Megan Fairchild in George Balanchine's “Tschaikovsky Suite No. 3.” Photograph by Paul Kolnik

subscribe to the latest in dance


“Uncommonly intelligent, substantial coverage.”

  • Weekly articles from the world of dance
  • Wide diversity of reviews, interviews, articles & more
  • Support for quality art journalism

Already a paid subscriber? Login

Indeed, the curtain-opener of the NYCB’s “All Balanchine I” program, the charming “Ballo,” with the superlative Tiler Peck in her debut in the principal ballerina role, came across as a shining masterpiece —a tour de force of virtuoso allegro dancing. Darting through the dynamic steps with effortlessness and exceptional exactitude, Peck commanded attention with every movement. The sheer exuberance of her mercurial dancing, illuminated by her upbeat and sunny personality, turned her performance into pure joy. Her effervescent polka variation, with its swift turns and crisp hops in fifth position, was particularly exhilarating to watch. This was the section of the dance where the music turned from regal to playful, even teasing, inspiring a filigree of intricate and rapid footwork so invigorating and bright, the choreography looked like nothing but a dazzling showpiece of bravura dancing; and Peck was simply breathtaking in it. A brilliant virtuoso at the top of her game, she sailed through the cascade of Balanchine’s most vigorous steps with impeccable style and alluring aplomb, investing her role with new energy and sparkle. Gonzalo Garcia was her skillful partner.

“Ballo” was choreographed to dance music from Verdi’s opera “Don Carlos.” With its aquatic imagery, this ballet slightly alludes to the scene of the opera, in which a fisherman searches for the most beautiful pearl to present to the Queen of Spain. During the performance, the all-female corps de ballet and four demi-soloists, all dressed in shimmering blue dresses, underscored the nautical atmosphere of the ballet. They glided through space with grace and fluid pliability—a tribe of mermaids blissfully surfing through the ocean’s waves. Their expansive movements—wide lunges, airy arabesques, and spacious turns—contrasted those of Peck, creating a striking juxtaposition of style and manner. In all, this “Ballo” proved a real gem, a ballet that I would be happy to see again and again.

“Kammermusik No.2” offered a different ensemble-versus-soloists juxtaposition, brining onstage an all-male corps de ballet and two leading couples. Whereas “Ballo della Regina” is all grace and charm, “Kammermusik” is utterly stark—an apt visual response to austere modernism of Paul Hindemith’s score of the same title to which this ballet is set. This was the second ballet Balanchine created to Hindemith’s music; the first being “The Four Temperaments” from 1946.

One can immediately notice numerous similarities between these two pieces. Just like in “The Four T’s,” in “Kammermusik” sharp body lines, thrusting gestures, and flat-footed turns reign supreme, boldly outlining a vivid dialogue between a solo piano (represented by four soloists) and a chamber orchestra (embodied by the eight-member male group). Rebecca Krohn, Abi Stafford, Adrian Danchig-Waring and Ask la Cour in the leading roles danced with notable fluency and a sense of daring. I found the dancing of Krohn, who imbued her role with zesty wit, especially impressive.

The program closed with a memorable performance of “Tschaikovsky’s Suite No. 3,” with Teresa Reichlen delivering a transformative rendition of the ballerina role in the opening “Élégi.” Never veering into moody clichés, Reichlen, usually so poised and impersonal, endowed her romantic heroine with a bittersweet ardor and genuine passion; her dramatic dancing giving rise to scenes which echoed “Swan Lake” and “Giselle.” The handsome and suave Zachary Catazaro was her inconsolable poet.

Ashley Laracéy and Jared Angle created another dreamy love story, though a happy one, in “Valse Melancolique.” Erica Pereira and Antonio Carmena looked relaxed and elated in the “Scherzo,” coolly capturing the music’s lively pulse. The vibrant Megan Fairchild and Joaquin de Luz shone in “Tema con Variazioni,” concluding the ballet—and the entire program—with a marvelous panache.

Oksana Khadarina


Oksana Khadarina is a Washington, DC–based dance writer. She has been covering dance at The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, as well as in New York City and internationally, since 2006. She has written for Dance Magazine, Pointe and DanceTabs, among other publications.

comments

Featured

A Parisian Dream
REVIEWS | Rachel Howard

A Parisian Dream

A participatory eagerness, a desire to be part of something sweet and beautiful, suffused the return of George Balanchine’s “A Midsummer Night’s Dream” to San Francisco Ballet on the cusp of spring.

Continue Reading
Sparks Flew
REVIEWS | Merilyn Jackson

Sparks Flew

Entering his 10th year as artistic director of Philadelphia Ballet, Ángel Corella put his artists through a ring of fire in their early spring concert at the Academy of Music.

Continue Reading
Good Subscription Agency